Piet Mondrian

Please note: If on devices you click on links to images and/or text that do not open if they should, just slightly scroll the screen to re-enable the function. Strange behavior of WordPress.

The beginnings

By naturalism we mean the first phase in which Mondrian still emulates natural semblances. Mondrian painted some three hundred fifty works, nearly a third of his entire output, during his naturalistic phase. I say about three hundred fifty because there is of course no clean break between the naturalistic phase and the subsequent development toward Expressionism. Some of the works produced between 1907 and 1908 can in fact still be described as naturalistic while others are already characterized by a more accentuated use of color.

The works selected illustrate the variety of subjects from which the young artist drew inspiration, making it possible in some cases to highlight aspects that were to become salient characteristics of his approach during the subsequent phase of development. The works produced between 1893 and 1907 were predominantly still lifes, portraits, and above all landscapes including drawings in pencil or charcoal, watercolors and works in oil on canvas:

Slide the carousel and click on the images to see a full format.

In the still-lifes the painter combines human artifacts (plates and vases) with natural products (fruit, fish, and flowers), thus creating attractive contrasts between precise, sharply defined shapes of man-made objects and the random organic natural forms; harmonious alternations of lines, surfaces, and volumes that open and close on interacting to generate finely balanced compositions in terms both of form and of color.

A premonitory still-life

Like Cézanne, Mondrian often went back to the same subject and painted it in different ways. We shall take as an example a series of still-lifes highlighting a dialectic between the one and the many; a theme that would become the common thread in Piet Mondrian’s entire oeuvre.

In the first painting we see some apples lying at random on a table. Each apple differs from the others in terms of position and appearance. In the other three paintings we see apples together with a large round plate positioned vertically in such a way as to present a circular shape acting as a background to the apples:

A relation is born between this perfect circle and the imperfect circles of the apples, as though the painter wished to show the changing appearance of natural forms (the apples) and a form of greater constancy and precision (the circle presented by the plate, a man-made, artificial object).
The perfect circle placed in the center evokes an ideal model of the variable and multiform natural appearance.

The landscapes

The landscapes depict rural areas of the Netherlands, showing houses, churches, farms, and scenes of everyday life, woods and rows of trees, moored boats or windmills silhouetted against the horizon.

The artist often painted riverside landscapes:

The oval suggests the desire to contain the flowing expansion of the river and consider nature in its wholeness. “I was struck by the vastness of nature and I tried to express expansion, tranquillity, unity”. (Mondrian) 

The flowing river expresses expansion while the oval form suggests unity. The oval remains however open to the sides, that is to say to the boundless space of nature evoked by the river. Any human attempt to comprehend the infinite variety of nature at once (the oval form) would appear pretentious to the artist.

The search for unity is also manifested through the use of light. Around 1907 the artist worked at several paintings in the light of evening and by moonlight:

A special landscape

The artist painted many landscapes, sometimes returning to subjects that evidently suggested something very precise to him. The landscape we now examine presents in a different form the theme of the one and the many that we have observed in the still life examined above.

Around 1899 Mondrian paints only the trunks of some beech trees in a wood. Fig. 1 shows a recent photograph of analogous whereabouts which may have inspired the artist. Each trunk has its own particular appearance and, all together, they express the sense of the endless variety seen in nature that the painter expresses in a drawing (Fig. 2):

The ground from which the vertical logs rise extends horizontally.

The multifarious horizontal expanse of vertical trunks seen in Fig. 2 attains a moment of unitary synthesis in Fig. 3, where the horizontal of the ground joins up in the center with the vertical of the trunks. The vertical concentrates the horizontal expanding toward the sides (Fig. 4):

A multiplicity of trunks, each one different from the other, merge together into an ideal unity. Again, as in the still life of

A multiplicity of trunks, each one different from the other, merge together into an ideal unity. Again, as in the still life of 1901, the desire to suggest a manifold space that finds unity is manifested in the central area of the painting. We will see how this tendency to emphasize a synthesis in the center of the composition will be a constant feature until 1920.

In the paintings of these years, whether still lifes or landscapes, the artist saw nature on the one hand as multiplying its appearances and prompting the consciousness to contemplate an extended, multiform space, and on the other as always remaining the same. Mondrian’s gaze settled on the variety of particular aspects without forgetting that all that variety is ultimately an indissoluble unity.

Human figures

The human figures consist of a variety of characters. Some are portraits produced on commission and others prompted by the painter’s own interests. These are mostly presented in contemplative attitudes. What interested the artist in a face were often the eyes, a link with the soul. He seems intent on capturing some secret, intimate reality in the outward appearance of a face:

Flowers

Interpenetration of opposites

A theme repeatedly addressed around 1900 is a landscape with a tree standing beside an irrigation ditch, of which Mondrian produced at least eight versions (four oil paintings, three drawings, and one watercolor):

The trunk of the tree expresses a vertical line that displays a tendency to expand horizontally in its upper section, where the branches begin. The ditch instead appears as a vertical that tends to expand horizontally as it moves downward. The vertical trunk opens out horizontally from the bottom toward the top and the ditch does the same thing but in the opposite direction. The two tendencies meet in the central area of the composition to suggest the interpenetration of opposing elements. Here too we see the dawn of the dialectic of opposites that was to inform all of Mondrian’s subsequent work.

St. Jakob’s Church

Another variation on the same theme is a landscape at the center of which we see a village church. It is the St. Jakob’s Church in the village of Winterswjik where the artist’s family has been living in. 

After preliminary studies, the painter represents the scene from a particular viewpoint which allows him to express contrast between the chaotic web of the tree branches and the rectilinear and precise shape of the architectural skyline of the village in the background and particularly of the vertical church tower: 

top of page

next page: Mondrian’s Expressionism

back to overview

home